You have a very firm understanding of all the pieces in play.
But essentially, your argument is “no true python developer would question this pattern”?
You have a very firm understanding of all the pieces in play.
But essentially, your argument is “no true python developer would question this pattern”?
flipmcf via Plone Community wrote at 2024-2-7 04:34 +0000:
...
But essentially, your argument is “no true python developer would question this pattern”?
I argument "when you question the design of a decorated function
definition, you must not only look at the definition but also
at the decorators!"
Author:
Guido van Rossum, Alyssa Coghlan
In this PEP, context managers provide `__enter__()`
and `__exit__()` methods that are invoked on
entry to and exit from the body of the with statement.
===
No true python developers?
While I agree with everything, the code in question is a very internal part of the machine here, rarely touched.
We have here two concepts to understand, both on the more advanced side.
I do not see a immediate need for change in the code. We may want to add some explaining lines to it.
No worries, happens to all of us from time to time.
I meant to imply that it was, most likely, just the simplest, easiest, quickest (pick any) to extract a function, decorate it and be done.